Skip to product information
1 of 6

Polyester Floral Twin Duvet Cover, Brown & Pink

Polyester Floral Twin Duvet Cover, Brown & Pink

Regular price $34.90
Regular price $62.60 Sale price $34.90
Sale Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.
Size
  • Hand-curated edit
  • Ships within the US
  • Returns accepted
View full details

Details

The Polyester Floral Twin Duvet Cover in brown and pink offers a refined layer of comfort for your sleeping space, designed for both aesthetic appeal and ease of care.

Crafted from 100% polyester, this twin duvet cover presents a design of rich, deep brown complemented by delicate pink flowers. It provides a distinct aesthetic for any bedroom, evoking a sense of vintage-inspired bedding without pretense. The material is chosen for its enduring quality and straightforward maintenance, ensuring a lasting presence in your home.

  • Constructed from 100% polyester for durability and ease.
  • Includes one twin duvet cover (68x86 inches) and one standard pillowcase (20x30 inches).
  • Features a rich brown and pink floral design.
  • Designed for convenient care, suitable for machine washing.

Frequently asked questions

What materials are used in this duvet cover?

This duvet cover is crafted from 100% polyester.

What is included with the Twin size duvet cover?

The Twin size includes one duvet cover measuring 68x86 inches and one matching pillowcase measuring 20x30 inches. A duvet insert is not included.

How should I care for this polyester duvet cover?

This duvet cover can be dry cleaned or machine washed warm. Tumble dry gentle/low or dip dry, using a mild detergent. Avoid bleach.

Why shop ARCADA

This piece is crafted by Tache Home Fashion, an independent home brand we curate

Curated, not cluttered

Every piece is hand-chosen from independent makers — no endless aisles, just well-made things.

A real brand behind it

Made by Tache Home Fashion — not an anonymous factory listing.

🔒

Secure & US-based

Encrypted checkout, ships from the US, with responsive support if anything isn’t right.